Home
Introduction
Briefings
Move 1
Move 2
Discussion
Summary
Conclusion
Appendix
Links
Contact

Summary of Findings

Out-brief to Participants

1. Summary of General Findings

  • Political control of the mission is essential in a complex environment.
  • The political definition and clarity of roles within the mission is as important to the Humanitarian and NGO community as it is to the military and other components.
  • Early establishment of coordination mechanisms and supporting structures is essential to good communications.
  • Joint evaluation of the mission requirements by the humanitarian organizations and other components is vital.
  • Personal relationships and leadership build successful missions.
  • Humanitarian tasks must become part of the comprehensive mission, which would include DDR and return of refugees as critical pieces.
  • Information exchange policies and structures are essential and need to be provided as part of the mission start-up.
  • Mechanisms need to be created to involve local authorities and local populations in all activities.
  • Concepts have to be developed that work for the mission specifically, and integrate tasks, such as return of refugees, rule of law, military separation of forces and disarmament and demobilization into the concept to gain synergy and ease of operation.  These are all areas of transition, which will have to be addressed in an integrated fashion as well.

2. Summary of Findings Specific to Security Issues

  • Humanitarian operations are often linked directly to security.  These operations include the return of refugees, disarmament, demobilization, and the rule of law, among others.
  • Humanitarian security issues need to be identified early and included in the security mission.
  • Coordinated security arrangements are essential to support humanitarian programs.
  • The military end state will be determined by success of other components.

3. Summary of Findings Specific to Humanitarian Activities

  • Humanitarian activities often extend beyond the life of the mission and realistic end states need to be established
  • The types of humanitarian activities will change over the life of the operation.
  • An interim humanitarian end state may be helpful.
  • Exit strategies and transition from emergency programs to sustainment and then development need to be planned. 
  • The ownership of the process must include the local players as well as the components that arrive from outside the country, such as humanitarians, police and military and other supporting components.
  • The relief, recovery, and reconstruction agenda needs to be established from the initiation of the mission

Accomplishments

  • This seminar game brought together influential and experienced civilian leaders and military officers, from NGOs, governments, and international organizations, who may lead and work together in a future regional crisis;
  • It enriched each participant's understanding of the valuable organizational perspectives and contributions offered by civilian and military players working in a complex contingency operation;
  • It improved participants' comprehension of the integration of a regional MNF in partnership with a UN mission, to resolve a crisis peacefully and to secure stability within a region;
  • The seminar game added significantly to the growing body of knowledge of how nations, IOs and NGOs can work together to respond to complex emergencies; and
  • Finally, it exposed senior civilian and military leaders to new and realistic solutions for successfully integrating civil-military, political-military and law enforcement components in complex contingency operations.

[Up to top]


The Center of Excellence DMHA