| Introduction
Background
The
Governments of Japan and the United States, and the UN Department
of Peacekeeping Operations collaboratively produced a multinational
seminar-game aimed
at uncovering civil-military relationship issues that accompany
modern peace support operations. On behalf of Japan, the International
Peace Cooperation Division of the Foreign Policy Bureau within the
Ministry of Foreign Affairs
co-sponsored the event, and assisted in the development and execution
of the seminar. On behalf of the United States, US Pacific
Command contributed funding through its support of the Asia Pacific
Peace Operations Capacity Building Program . The Center of
Excellence in Disaster Management and Humanitarian Assistance, a
civil-military liaison organization established by US Congress,
produced the content and executed the event.
Participation
The
event host and co-sponsors considered participation by international
(IO) and non-governmental organizations (NGO) crucial to the seminar's
success. Military and civilian police participants attended
from 14 countries in Asia and the Pacific, along side 9 international
(IO) and non-governmental organizations (NGOs). Countries
sending representatives were Australia, Bangladesh, India, Indonesia,
Japan, Korea, Malaysia, Mongolia, Nepal, Philippines, Sri Lanka,
Thailand, United States, and Vietnam. IOs participating included
the UN Office for the Coordination of Humanitarian Affairs (OCHA),
World Food Programme (WFP), UN Emergency Children's Fund (UNICEF),
UN High Commissioner for Refugees (UNHCR) and the International
Committee of the Red Cross (ICRC). Participating NGOs were
the Australian Council for Overseas Aid (ACFOA), Municipal Institute
for International Cooperation (Japan), Association for Aid and Relief
(Japan), and Peace Winds Japan.
A
panel held on the closing day was composed of included 11 additional
representatives from 10 Japanese NGOs: RENGO, Service for the Health
in Asian & African Regions (SHARE), BHN Telecommunications Humanitarian
Aid of Japan, Foundation for International Development & Relief,
ICA Japan, Amnesty International,
Japan NGO Center for International Cooperation, Minsai Center, Save
the Children, and the National Federation of UNESCO Association.
Content
and Focus
The
event focused on networking and improving awareness among the participants
about other sectors. Aspects of peace operations that the
seminar explored were:
- The
response strategies of the humanitarian community to a crisis;
- The
political management of a humanitarian focused mission and the
development of unity of effort between components;
- The
interface between the humanitarian community and the other components
in the mission;
- The
interaction between the varied agencies and organizations deployed
to a
crisis including international organizations, other governments
and non-governmental organizations;
- The
responsibilities of the host nation and parties to the conflict
in relation to the humanitarian effort;
- The
planning processes and how to generate consensus approaches in
the mission;
- Lessons
learned from recent operations, and;
- Managing
civil military operations.
Process
The
seminar opened with a day of expert briefs, followed by three days
of a tabletop game. It concluded with a morning panel discussion.
Expert briefings on the first day provided a common foundation for
discussion. The topics covered were Evolving UN Peace Operations,
The Humanitarian Role in Peacekeeping Operations, The Role of the
Military in Peace Operations, and Policy and Political Factors in
Shaping the Civil-Military Relationship.
The
3-day tabletop game was based on the concept of multinational participation
in a fictional complex peace operation mandated by the UN Security
Council, including
the full range of political, diplomatic, humanitarian, police, and
military components. The peace operations scenario was driven
by a border conflict between two mythical neighbors that resulted
in extensive displacement of populations and created a humanitarian
crisis to which the international community attempted to respond.
The crisis was resolved and a multinational force deployed, operating
in parallel to the existing UN mission, to enforce the peace and
to support the humanitarian relief effort, demarcation of the border
and the peaceful return of the displaced to their homes.
Problems
were explored based on two game moves which were presented by a
group of subject matter experts - individuals acknowledged as having
considerable personal experience in a subject - representing the
key leadership that would be found in a typical UN Peace Support
Mission. Throughout the course of the game these individuals
role-played the Mission's senior leadership team - Deputy Special
Representative to the Secretary General, Force Commander, Civilian
Police Commissioner, and Humanitarian Coordinator - to provide a
structure and to add realism. After the problems/game moves
were presented in plenary session, the participants dispersed into
smaller working groups to discuss the issues raised. A representative
of each group briefed the role players and their colleagues on their
group's findings in a plenary session.
The
game concluded on day five with a summary of the findings, which
represents the core product of the seminar. This out-brief
was followed by a panel discussion open to non-participant local
NGOs. The intention of the panel discussion
was: to articulate the challenges to civil-military cooperation
as observed by the participants themselves in real world situations;
to provide a forum for open discussion between civilian, humanitarian,
civilian police and military representatives on issues of greatest
concern to them; to promote understanding and awareness amongst
all of the players; to reflect on different perspectives and lessons
learned throughout the week; and, finally to consider new and novel
solutions to civil-military coordination issues
[Up
to top]
|