| For
some syndicates, the last four elements from the list above were directly
related to the desired end state and were put forward as the results
to be achieved from the successful achievement of the first two elements.
Friendly
and factional, as well as political, military, and even tactical
centers of gravity were identified. Centers of gravity are critical
issues for which failure to negotiate would compromise the success
of the entire mission. Primary centers included:
-
Commitment of government and factions to
the resolution and implementation of
prior agreements
-
External
influences, such as the actions of
bordering countries
-
Sustainment of international will
-
Secure environment to disarm and restore services within
-
Political
confidence building
Syndicates
then took individual approaches to the remainder of the problem.
Two syndicates identified phases of the operation similarly, as:
-
Force generation and deployment
-
Security, to include stabilizing the situation, establishing
a secure environment and reestablishing the rule of law
-
Operations, in one case to include peacekeeping force, diplomatic,
political and humanitarian efforts running simultaneously
-
Transfer
of authority
-
Re-deploy and disband mission upon achievement of end state

Dancers
provide entertainment at the closing dinner sponsored by the
Bangladesh Army. |
One
syndicate listed tasks associated with each phase. The final syndicate
defined the roles of the deployed forces based upon their functions,
suggesting that the many of the activities would take place in staggered
and overlapping fashion. Missing or inadequate force capabilities
and groups from which to seek additional guidance were also detailed
by this group, placing emphasis on the requirement for many disciplines
from both military and civilian sectors. Three syndicates either
selected or discussed rules of engagement.
Conclusions
Elements
of a mission plan needed for a unified approach encompass not only
the composition and size of military and civilian police forces,
but also their legal status as established through Structure of
Force Agreements (SOFAs), Rules of Engagement (ROEs) as well as
the status of Internally Displaced Persons (IDPs) and refugees.
It
was also evident that the planning process should cut across agencies
and be comprehensive, including all elements critical to the establishment
of peace. The longer-term view should focus on peace building and
all of its components, i.e., the re-establishment of civil institutions.
A clear, concise mission statement and description of the desired
end state are crucial to success.
Participants
in all fours syndicates felt that the time allotted was not sufficient
for solving the problem in its entirety as presented. The time constraint
coupled with the detail and complexity of the problem accounts in
part for the differences of approach during the second part of Move
2.
Next Page
[Up
to top]
|